Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Concept of the god had been invented by all scholars who preached a specific religion. This had been their imagination. However, th... -
Some of the Religions Following information I received through email. Does this email bring out facts? Give your comments with p... -
Reservation दिनांक 30 जानेवारीच्या दैनिक सकाळमध्ये माझे मत या मथळ्याखाली श्री. श्रीमंत कोकाटे यानी मांडलेले विचार वाचले. त्यानी ... -
People of part of the Andhra Pradesh in the area of Telangana are asking for a separate state of Telangana. Telangana region comprise ... -
Procedure for formation of the government should start from the moment election results are declared for at least 90% of the posts. Fo... -
If I am asked to write 5 names of the greatest men during last 5000 years in India , I will start from Rama, Krishna , Gautam Buddha, ... -
Facility of storing money in small size (high denomination notes) makes it easy for corrupt people to store their wealth acquired from un... -
Present education system is negligible modification to the old British India system. All stalwarts in education field say every child ... -
यदी आप गुगल क्रोम इस्तेमाल करते हो तो हिंदी में पढ़ने के लिये इधर क्लिक किजीये . फायर फॉक्स आय ई इस्तेमाल ... -
Lord Shree Krishna Indians consider Lord Shree Krishna as the God. As per the definition given by Maharshi (a saint and scholar) Yva...
3 comments:
दिल्ली बलात्कार प्रकरणावर आता स्वयंघोषित साधू, मौैलवी, मुसलमान राजकारणीही मते मांडू लागले आहेत. जर त्या मुलीने जर भाऊ मानले असते तर त्यांने तिला वाचविले असते. हे किती परिणामकारक आहेे ते साधूनाच विचारले पाहिजे. दुसरा म्हणचो जर बुरखा घातला असता तर ती मुलगू वाचली असती. संस्कृतमध्ये एक वचन आहे “कामातुराणाम् न भयम् न लज्जा।” वासनेचा प्रभाव इतका आहे की अशाना ना भिती वाटते ना लाज. त्या मुलीने भाऊ मानले असते अथवा बुरखा घातला असता तरी त्यां राक्षसांवर कसलाही परिणाम झाला नसता. परिणामकारक फक्त धाक. शासनाचा धाक असता तरच ती मुलगी वाचली असती. दोष मुलीला द्यावयाच्या ऐवजी शासनाला द्या. जे लोक गुन्हेगारांना धाकात ठेवत नाहीत त्यांना शासनात राहण्याचा अधिकारच नाही. जनतेने शांततापूर्वक आंदोलन करावे व ते शासनाच्या (संत्र्यापासून मंत्र्यांपर्यंत हे सर्वच त्यात आले.) विरुद्ध करावे. नुसते कायदे करून उपयोग नाही ते परिणामकारक पद्धतिने राबविले पाहिजेत. दोषींना 5-6 महिन्यांच्या आत शिक्षा झाली पाहिजे व नंतर एक महिन्याच्या आत अम्मलात आणली पाहिजे.
Is it right to teach women to fight on their own? Can the rapist also learn the same tricks. In my opinion the government must imbibe fear in the minds of rapists so they never even think of raping a woman. Training women for self defence shows failure of the government. All people must raise their voice to force government to imbibe fear in the mind of rapists rather than training women in self defence.
Now the government is playing tricks. So called peoples representatives want to place a loophole in the proposed law. "Age for Consent for sex" This is not a valid provision on two accounts. Firstly, people with money power can always make the girl to accept any thing which suits the culprit. Age is not going to serve any purpose to help women who are raped. Secondly, if consent for sex at an age lower than lower age limit for marriage would mean the law accepts sex between any two persons whether married or unmarried. This is totally against the religious beliefs and social acceptance. The provision should be simple. "Age of the culprit shall not be a consideration for deciding suitable court for the case. All culprits irrespective of age shall be considered equally" This provision should be the part of the law. Some may think that some women would take disadvantage of this provision. However, proving the guilt is the responsibility of the victim. Therefore, I do not think that would raise any obstacle. In spite of this if some body proves my thinking wrong then there is a possibility of making provision for such eventuality. If the government is not in a position to find a solution the same may be invited from women's organisations and general public.
Post a Comment