Tweet

Monday, 7 January 2013

Security of women in India

3 comments:

माधव बामणे said...

दिल्ली बलात्कार प्रकरणावर आता स्वयंघोषित साधू, मौैलवी, मुसलमान राजकारणीही मते मांडू लागले आहेत. जर त्या मुलीने जर भाऊ मानले असते तर त्यांने तिला वाचविले असते. हे किती परिणामकारक आहेे ते साधूनाच विचारले पाहिजे. दुसरा म्हणचो जर बुरखा घातला असता तर ती मुलगू वाचली असती. संस्कृतमध्ये एक वचन आहे “कामातुराणाम् न भयम् न लज्जा।” वासनेचा प्रभाव इतका आहे की अशाना ना भिती वाटते ना लाज. त्या मुलीने भाऊ मानले असते अथवा बुरखा घातला असता तरी त्यां राक्षसांवर कसलाही परिणाम झाला नसता. परिणामकारक फक्त धाक. शासनाचा धाक असता तरच ती मुलगी वाचली असती. दोष मुलीला द्यावयाच्या ऐवजी शासनाला द्या. जे लोक गुन्हेगारांना धाकात ठेवत नाहीत त्यांना शासनात राहण्याचा अधिकारच नाही. जनतेने शांततापूर्वक आंदोलन करावे व ते शासनाच्या (संत्र्यापासून मंत्र्यांपर्यंत हे सर्वच त्यात आले.) विरुद्ध करावे. नुसते कायदे करून उपयोग नाही ते परिणामकारक पद्धतिने राबविले पाहिजेत. दोषींना 5-6 महिन्यांच्या आत शिक्षा झाली पाहिजे व नंतर एक महिन्याच्या आत अम्मलात आणली पाहिजे.

Madhav Bamne said...

Is it right to teach women to fight on their own? Can the rapist also learn the same tricks. In my opinion the government must imbibe fear in the minds of rapists so they never even think of raping a woman. Training women for self defence shows failure of the government. All people must raise their voice to force government to imbibe fear in the mind of rapists rather than training women in self defence.

Jana Hitwadi said...

Now the government is playing tricks. So called peoples representatives want to place a loophole in the proposed law. "Age for Consent for sex" This is not a valid provision on two accounts. Firstly, people with money power can always make the girl to accept any thing which suits the culprit. Age is not going to serve any purpose to help women who are raped. Secondly, if consent for sex at an age lower than lower age limit for marriage would mean the law accepts sex between any two persons whether married or unmarried. This is totally against the religious beliefs and social acceptance. The provision should be simple. "Age of the culprit shall not be a consideration for deciding suitable court for the case. All culprits irrespective of age shall be considered equally" This provision should be the part of the law. Some may think that some women would take disadvantage of this provision. However, proving the guilt is the responsibility of the victim. Therefore, I do not think that would raise any obstacle. In spite of this if some body proves my thinking wrong then there is a possibility of making provision for such eventuality. If the government is not in a position to find a solution the same may be invited from women's organisations and general public.

Popular Posts